Tags: Pixar

Brave

by Og
Categories: animation, AnimWatch
Tags: ,
Comments: 6 Comments
Published on: November 16, 2011

Pixar’s next film – Brave – looks fan-dang-tastic. Mulan in Scotland? Maybe. But also, Aye, Laddie, and wha’s no’ ta liek?

Hopefully, this will make up for the scars on my eyes from Cars 2.

Toy Story 3

by Og
Categories: animation, Art
Tags: ,
Comments: 2 Comments
Published on: October 12, 2009

Well, with Toy Story 1 and 2 in a theatre near you (limited release) in Glorious Stereoscopic 3D(TM) it was only a matter of time until everyone learned the real reason those films were re-released…Toy Story 3 is on its way! Whet your appetite with a nice interview with director Lee Unkrich now online, as well as the latest trailer, which at least makes me a little more interested than the teaser, which honestly reeked of Overmilking the Franchise. The new TS3 may be overmilking it, too, but there are at least some nice character moments and the hint of a story that might hold together. The trailer does make it seem like TS3 repeats many of the themes, and even some of the moments, from its predecessors – that shot of Woody on his shelf with the slow pullback as Randy Newman’s song “I’ll Never Get Over Losing You” hits its final notes could have been part of either film. But on balance, I’m hopeful for a good film.

I’m a Pixar fan as well as a Toy Story fan, so I’ll be seeing it anyway.

The Secret of Pixar’s Success

by Og
Categories: animation, Film, philosophy
Tags: ,
Comments: 5 Comments
Published on: May 24, 2009

There was a great article in the Baltimore Sun today that both delights me and has me scratching my head.

The article delights me because it reinforces some ideas I already had, and publicly stated some less-known things I already knew. These truths I hold to be self-evident boil down to this: the secret of Pixar’s success has to do with doing things differently than the rest of Hollywood. Basically, they focus on story, tell the stories they want to tell, even if the characters don’t come from the Big Book of Hollywood Licensable Characters, and most importantly, they ignore the Suits, Beancounters and Crystal Ball Gazers to which the rest of the industry seems to have abdicated their creative power. There are highly paid guys at studios, publishers, distributors and labels, who so far as I can see, don’t do anything productive. I mean, they don’t create anything. Their main function seems to be to get between the creatives and the audience and say no to unconventional but good ideas. But that doesn’t occur at Pixar.

The article has me scratching my head, because as I read the words, I couldn’t help wondering why the rest of the moviemaking industry hasn’t tried to copy Pixar. I mean, they have tried to copy Pixar when it comes to character design, rendering technology, and so forth… the nuts and bolts, the technicalities of making any film. The technical exercise, they’ve got down cold, of course, because that’s the easy part. But they haven’t tried to copy Pixar in the sense of How You Make Good Movies, how you ignore the suits and greedy bastards, ignore the people who say “no one wants to see a film about a rat”, and get on to the business of telling real, honest-to-God stories with characters an audience might remember in 10 years, after the toys and tie-ins and Happy Meals are gone.

Anyway, the article is far more eloquent than I, but I will pull out a couple of my favorite passages for your browsing convenience:

“[Up creates] a narrative that operates less like a roller coaster than an old-fashioned merry-go-round, with panels that light up and illuminate the core. And because Pixar is also a director-driven studio, Docter didn’t have to stand for any second-guessing based on executives’ condescending notions of audience expectations or the slanted reactions of recruited focus groups.”

and

“When will the rest of Hollywood learn Pixar’s lessons? When will people realize that “conventional wisdom” is rarely wise at all? Hollywood may be sure to pull in a certain tidy sum with a Kate Hudson or Matthew McConaughey comedy or Nicolas Cage slumming in another comic book or fantasy film, but these movies are just killing time in every way. They build no legacy for the art or the industry and leave no feelings of love or loyalty in an audience.”

As for listening to Suits and Beancounters, if there’s anything I think America and the world would have learned from the whole Financial Meltdown caused by truth-blind managers and short-term-focused beancounters is that listening to that collective group is the absolutely wrong way to go. Please tell me we’ve at least learned that, whether we’re talking about making entertainment, or just running the world.

Pixar’s Partly Cloudy

by Og
Categories: animation, AnimWatch
Comments: No Comments
Published on: April 18, 2009

Pixar’s next short “Partly Cloudy” will be the directorial debut of Peter Sohn. As a bit of trivia, he’s the guy who provided the voice of Emile in Ratatouille.

There’s a nice big version of the above pic at AICN for those into the eyecandy. Meanwhile, here’s Pixar’s official synopsis of the film:

Everyone knows that the stork delivers babies, but where do the storks get the babies from? The answer lies up in the stratosphere, where cloud people sculpt babies from clouds and bring them to life. Gus, a lonely and insecure grey cloud, is a master at creating “dangerous” babies. Crocodiles, porcupines, rams and more–Gus’s beloved creations are works of art, but more than a handful for his loyal delivery stork partner, Peck. As Gus’s creations become more and more rambunctious, Peck’s job gets harder and harder. How will Peck manage to handle both his hazardous cargo and his friend’s fiery temperament?

Partly Cloudy will be attached to Up which hits theaters on May 29th, 2009.

page 1 of 1
Archives
Welcome , today is Wednesday, May 23, 2012